General

FRANK M. MAIN, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. CUEN, Defendant in Error

4 Ariz. 139·Arizona Supreme Court·1893·AZ

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[Civil No. 336.] FRANK M. MAIN, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. CUEN, Defendant in Error. WRIT OF ERROR from District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. Richard E. Sloan, Judge. Barnes &, Martin, for Plaintiff in Error. F. J. Heney, for Defendant in Error, and Jeffords & Franklin, of counsel. January 28, 1893. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. The only question sought to be presented in this case is as to the exclusion by the court of evidence proposed by plaintiff in error at the trial. There is no statement of facts in the record, and the proposed evidence is not included in the bill of exceptions. No briefs have been filed by either party, though the cause has been in this court for more than a year. The record discloses no error, The writ denied. Gooding, O. J., Kibbey, J., Wells, J.