General
Bradley S. Horton, Appellant, v. Nathaniel Dominy et al., Respondents
85 N.Y. 642·New York Court of Appeals·1881·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bradley S. Horton, Appellant, v. Nathaniel Dominy et al., Respondents.
(Submitted June 7, 1881;
decided June 14, 1881.)
George Miller for appellant.
William Wickham for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Mem. for affirmance of order of General Term and for judgment absolute against plaintiff, on authority of Hallock v. Dominy et al. (69 N. Y. 238).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.