Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rosie Rydzenski, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad Company, Respondent, 1889 — 115 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
Rosie Rydzenski, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad Company, Respondent
115 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rosie Rydzenski, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued June 14, 1889;
decided June 25, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made July 1,1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of the defendant on trial, entered upon an order dismissing the complaint.
Thomas W. Fitzgerald for appellant.
William W. MacFarland for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.