Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaret Egan and Catharine Egan, Jr., by Guardians, etc., Respondents, v. The Supreme Council, Catholic Benevolent Legion, Appellant, 1900 — 161 N.Y. 650 · caselaw · US
General
Margaret Egan and Catharine Egan, Jr., by Guardians, etc., Respondents, v. The Supreme Council, Catholic Benevolent Legion, Appellant
161 N.Y. 650·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Egan and Catharine Egan, Jr., by Guardians, etc., Respondents, v. The Supreme Council, Catholic Benevolent Legion, Appellant.
Egan v. Supreme Council, 32 App. Div. 245, affirmed.
(Submitted January 12, 1900;
decided January 30, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 12, 1898, upon an order which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Ed/win O. Low for appellant.
Ed/ward Llerrma/rm for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.