General
William Fox, Respondent, v. Automatic Vaudeville Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Solomon Schinasi and Rudolph P. Miller, Superintendent of Buildings, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, Defendants
140 A.D. 926·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1910·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Fox, Respondent, v. Automatic Vaudeville Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Solomon Schinasi and Rudolph P. Miller, Superintendent of Buildings, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, Defendants.
Appeal from, an order of the Special Term granting an injunction restraining the appellant pendente lite from acting on any approval of plans, etc.
[MAJORITY — Pee Curiam:]
Pee Curiam:
The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the opinion in Brill v. Miller, decided herewith (ante, p. 602). Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.