Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
International Association of Machinists et al. v. Street et al., 1960 — 362 U.S. 915 · caselaw · US
General
International Association of Machinists et al. v. Street et al.
362 U.S. 915·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 258.
International Association of Machinists et al. v. Street et al.
Clarence M. Mul-holland, Edward J. Hickey, Jr. and James L. Highsaw for the Railway Labor Executives’ Association.
J. Albert Woll, Theodore J. St. Antoine and Thomas E. Harris for the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations.
E. Smythe Gambrell and W. Olen Harlan for individual appellees in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Georgia. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 361 U. S. 807.) The motions of Railway Labor Executives’ Association and the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations for leave to file briefs, as amicus curiae, are granted.