Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wyandotte Transportation Co. et al. v. United States, 1967 — 386 U.S. 906 · caselaw · US
General
Wyandotte Transportation Co. et al. v. United States
386 U.S. 906·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 838.
Wyandotte Transportation Co. et al. v. United States.
Lucian Y. Ray and Benjamin W. Yancey for Wyandotte Transportation Co., George B. Matthews for Union Barge Line Corp;, and Tom F. Phillips for Cargill, Inc., et al., petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.