Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re WEEKS POULTRY COMMUNITY, Inc., 1931 — 51 F.2d 122 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In re WEEKS POULTRY COMMUNITY, Inc.
51 F.2d 122·United States District Court for the Southern District of California·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re WEEKS POULTRY COMMUNITY, Inc.
No. 14220-H.
District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.
Jan. 10, 1931.
Kiggens & Hoffman and Leslie S. Bowden, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioning creditors.
Edson Abel, of San Francisco, Cal., for Los Angeles County Farm Bureau.
George C. Johnson, of Los Angeles, Cal., for alleged bankrupt.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, of Los Angeles, Cal., for intervening creditor.
[MAJORITY — COSGRAVE, District Judge.]
COSGRAVE, District Judge.
From a study of this case I am of the opinion that the alleged bankrupt is not a moneyed, business, or commercial corporation within the meaning of the United Stated Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA), and that In re Dairy Marketing Ass’n of Ft. Wayne, Inc. (D. C.) 8 F.(2d) 626, clearly decides the question. The other business, if it could be called sueh, transacted, was merely incidental to the main business of the association.
The recommendations of the special master are therefore adopted, and counsel for the alleged bankrupt will prepare a decree accordingly.