Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Robert Plaut, Respondent, v. Robert L. Moores et al., Appellants, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 646 · caselaw · US
General
Robert Plaut, Respondent, v. Robert L. Moores et al., Appellants
142 N.Y. 646·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert Plaut, Respondent, v. Robert L. Moores et al., Appellants.
(Submitted April 9, 1894;
decided April 24, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Oourt in the second judicial department, made February 12, 1893, which affirmed orders of the Special Term requiring the appellant La Fayette R. Beckley to complete a purchase made by him at a sale under judgment of foreclosure herein.
JL. R. BeoTdey, appellant, in person.
G. J. Wiederhold for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.