Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Martin Van Buren, Respondent, v. The First National Bank of Cooperstown, Appellant, 1902 — 169 N.Y. 610 · caselaw · US
General
Martin Van Buren, Respondent, v. The First National Bank of Cooperstown, Appellant
169 N.Y. 610·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Martin Van Buren, Respondent, v. The First National Bank of Cooperstown, Appellant.
Van Burén v. Mrst National Bank, 53 App. Div. 80, affirmed.
(Argued January 13, 1902;
decided January 28, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 12, 1900, affirming a' judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term after the submission of a certain question to the jury.
lynn J. Arnold for appellant.
A. G. Tennant for respondent. .
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.