Torts · MBE-tested
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WON LEE WING, Appellant
47 Cal. App. 326·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1920·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Crim. No. 501.
Third Appellate District.
May 3, 1920.]
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WON LEE WING, Appellant.
Criminal Law—Assault With Deadly Weapon—Appeal—Affirmance of Judgment.—Where a defendant charged with the crime of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder is found guilty of assault with a deadly weapon and, on appeal, no argument is made in his behalf and no reason appears why the verdict should be disturbed, the judgment will be affirmed.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge.
Affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. •
Geo. E. Foote and J. W. Mento for Appellant.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Chas. Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
Defendant was charged with the crime of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder and he was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon.
No argument has been made in this court in his behalf, his counsel concluding, no doubt, in view of the record, that any discussion would be useless. The evidence is overwhelming and conclusive as to his guilt. Indeed, he was greatly favored by the jury in rendering a verdict for 'the lesser offense. His rights were all safeguarded by the lower court and he had a fair trial. No reason exists why the verdict should be disturbed, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.