Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Theresa Storm et al., Appellants, v. Sophie McGrover et al., Individually and as Administratrices of the Estate of Caroline Preiss, Deceased, et al., Respondents, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 525 · caselaw · US
General
Theresa Storm et al., Appellants, v. Sophie McGrover et al., Individually and as Administratrices of the Estate of Caroline Preiss, Deceased, et al., Respondents
174 N.Y. 525·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Theresa Storm et al., Appellants, v. Sophie McGrover et al., Individually and as Administratrices of the Estate of Caroline Preiss, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Storm v. McGrover, 70 App. Div. 33, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted March 16, 1903;
decided March 24, 1903.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 13, 1902, reversing an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Robert JET. Barnet for motion.
Eugene Cohn and Julius Levy opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs in this court and ten dollars costs of motion.