Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Crane Company, Respondent, v. Frederick J. Smythe, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Whitmore & Whitmore, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 545 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Crane Company, Respondent, v. Frederick J. Smythe, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Whitmore & Whitmore, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
182 N.Y. 545·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Crane Company, Respondent, v. Frederick J. Smythe, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Whitmore & Whitmore, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
(Argued June 14, 1905;
decided October 3, 1905.)
Crane Co. v. Pneumatic Signal Co., 94 App. Div. 53, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 6, 1904, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term and granting a new trial.
Thomas Raines for appellant.
Curtis Fitz Simons for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.