Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Osment v. Pitcairn et al., Receivers, 1942 — 317 U.S. 587 · caselaw · US
General
Osment v. Pitcairn et al., Receivers
317 U.S. 587·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 140.
Osment v. Pitcairn et al., Receivers.
October 12, 1942.
Mr. H. G. Waltner, Jr. for petitioner.
Messrs. Edgar Shook and N. S. Brown for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The last clause of § 4 of the 1890 amendments to Article VI of the Missouri constitution provides that “when a division [of the Supreme Court of Missouri] in which a cause is pending shall so order, the cause shall be transferred to the court for its decision.” In Scheufler v. Manufacturing Lumbermen’s Underwriters, decided July 7, 1942, the Supreme Court of Missouri stated that under this clause “either division, on application or its own motion and for reasons deemed sufficient though not enumerated in the section, may order a cause transferred to the court en banc.” 349 Mo. 855, 857; 163 S. W. 2d 749, 750. In this case petitioner made no application to transfer the cause from Division Two, where it was heard and decided, to the court en banc. As it does not appear that petitioner has exhausted the appellate review provided by state law, the petition for certiorari must be denied for want of jurisdiction. Gorman v. Washington University, 316 U. S. 98, and cases cited.