General
Pyro Plastics Corp. v. United States; I. B. Wolfset & Co. v. United States; Thornley & Pitt v. United States; A & A Trading Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1011·United States Customs Court·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the First Division,
March 6, 1968
No. P68/111.
protests 58/1221, 59/4404, and 59/15481 (New York).
No. P68/112.
protests 58/6008, 58/19008, and 60/441 (New York).
No. P68/113.
protest 59/25587 (San Francisco).
No. P68/114.
protest 61/9462 (New York).
Pyro Plastics Corp. v. United States, I. B. Wolfset & Co. v. United States, Thornley & Pitt v. United States, A & A Trading Corp. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Maletz, J.]
Maletz, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.