Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sylvester L. McLAURIN, Appellant, v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 1933 — 62 F.2d 1063 · caselaw · US
General
Sylvester L. McLAURIN, Appellant, v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
62 F.2d 1063·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1933
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and EOBB, VAN ORSDEL, and GEONEE, Associate Justices.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sylvester L. McLAURIN, Appellant, v. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 5645.
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Argued Dec. 5, 1932.
Decided Jan. 9, 1933.
S. L. McLaurin, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Bolitha J. Laws, and Charles F. Wilson, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and EOBB, VAN ORSDEL, and GEONEE, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — PEE CUEIAM.]
PEE CUEIAM.
Appellant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, in general term, disbarring him from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. A careful examination of the record discloses ample evidence to support the finding of the court below.
The judgment is affirmed.