Corporations
Bagley & Sewall Company, Respondent, v. Osborne Paper Mill Equipment Corporation, Defendant, and Arthur E. Bell, Appellant
272 A.D.2d 1034·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1947·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bagley & Sewall Company, Respondent, v. Osborne Paper Mill Equipment Corporation, Defendant, and Arthur E. Bell, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ. [See ante, p. 955.]