Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alfred H. Smith et al., Respondents, v. Henry Clews, Appellant, 1891 — 124 N.Y. 664 · caselaw · US
General
Alfred H. Smith et al., Respondents, v. Henry Clews, Appellant
124 N.Y. 664·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alfred H. Smith et al., Respondents, v. Henry Clews, Appellant.
(Argued March 10, 1891;
decided April 7, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term oi the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made December 29, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order deny, ing a motion for a new trial.
Albert A. Abbott for appellant.
Charles H. Woodbwry for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.