Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Flournoy, Sheriff and Ex-Officio Tax Collector, v. Wiener et al., 1944 — 321 U.S. 754 · caselaw · US
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
Flournoy, Sheriff and Ex-Officio Tax Collector, v. Wiener et al.
321 U.S. 754·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 252.
Flournoy, Sheriff and Ex-Officio Tax Collector, v. Wiener et al.
March 27, 1944.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that the opinion in this case be amended by adding, at the end of the opinion, the following paragraph:
“Appellant having assigned as error the decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court holding the federal Act invalid, the case is properly an appeal, and appellant could have included in his assignments of error any other denial of federal right whether or not capable in itself of being brought here by appeal. Prudential Insurance Co. v. Cheek, 259 U. S. 530, 547. Or he could have filed a petition for writ of certiorari in addition to his appeal. Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Miller, 283 U. S. 96, 98. But since he failed to raise or brief in this Court any question as to the validity of the Louisiana statute under the Fourteenth Amendment, we have no jurisdiction of the case either on certiorari or on appeal, and there is no occasion for the application of Judicial Code, § 237 (c), 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c). See Robertson and Kirkham, Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States, page 40, and cases cited.”
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Opinion reported as amended ante, p. 253.