Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro, Inc., 1948 — 333 U.S. 852 · caselaw · US
General
Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro, Inc.
333 U.S. 852·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 379.
Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro, Inc.
Robert Leander Davidson for petitioner.
Samuel Frank Fowler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for rehearing is granted. The order entered December 15, 1947, denying certiorari, 332 U. S. 841, is vacated and the petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma is granted.