Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Beverhout Thompson, Appellant, v. Annie Stanley, as Administratrix, etc., and The Harris & Dew Faucet Plug and Bung Company, Respondents, 1895 — 147 N.Y. 713 · caselaw · US
General
Beverhout Thompson, Appellant, v. Annie Stanley, as Administratrix, etc., and The Harris & Dew Faucet Plug and Bung Company, Respondents
147 N.Y. 713·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Beverhout Thompson, Appellant, v. Annie Stanley, as Administratrix, etc., and The Harris & Dew Faucet Plug and Bung Company, Respondents.
Reported below, 73 Hun, 248.
(Argued October 16, 1895;
decided November 1, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made November 17,. 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiff’s complaint entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Ladislas Large for appellant.
Frederick Seymour for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirihed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.