Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. et al., 1965 — 380 U.S. 448 · caselaw · US
General
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. et al.
380 U.S. 44814 L. Ed. 2d 151·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. et al.
No. 21.
Argued November 17, 1964.
Decided April 5, 1965.
John C. Danielson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Jordan Jay Hillman.
Frank M. Long argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Philip H. Porter, R. K. Merrill and Richard R. Robinson.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Or-rick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur Cerra filed a memorandum for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed. Texas & P. R. Co. v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co., 270 U. S. 266, 278.