Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lizzie Briel, Respondent, v. The City of Buffalo, Appellant, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 699 · caselaw · US
General
Lizzie Briel, Respondent, v. The City of Buffalo, Appellant
156 N.Y. 699·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lizzie Briel, Respondent, v. The City of Buffalo, Appellant.
Briel v. Gity of Buffalo, 90 Hun, 93, affirmed.
(Argued June 21, 1898;
decided October 4, 1898.)
Appeal from an order and judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered November 8, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
W. H. Cuddeback and C. V. Nellany for appellant.
Wallace Thayer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order and judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur, except O’Brien, J., absent.