Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Washington Belt et al., Appellants, v. The American Central Insurance Company, Respondent, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 675 · caselaw · US
General
Washington Belt et al., Appellants, v. The American Central Insurance Company, Respondent
160 N.Y. 675·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Washington Belt et al., Appellants, v. The American Central Insurance Company, Respondent.
(Submitted October 3, 1899;
decided October 10, 1899.)
Reported below, 29 App. Div. 546.
Motion to prefer an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate ■ Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 21, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the ground that this was a second appeal and should be advanced to a position oil the calendar as of the date of May 3, 1894, the date of filing the original return, under section 195 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Cardozo & Nathan for motion.
[MAJORITY]
No one opposed.
Motion granted, without costs.