Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nicole A. DALMAZZI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES., 2017 — 138 S. Ct. 53 · caselaw · US
General
Nicole A. DALMAZZI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
138 S. Ct. 53198 L. Ed. 2d 780·Supreme Court of the United States·2017
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nicole A. DALMAZZI, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 16-961.
Supreme Court of the United States
Sept. 28, 2017.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is granted. The case is consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether this Court has jurisdiction to review the case in Nos. 16-961 and 16-1017 under 28 U.S.C. § 1259(3).