Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Farnum v. Connecticut et al., 1958 — 357 U.S. 916 · caselaw · US
General
Farnum v. Connecticut et al.
357 U.S. 916·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 716,
Misc.
Farnum v. Connecticut et al.
Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Harold Borgwald, Assistant Attorneys General, for the New York State Department of Mental Hygiene, appellee.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.