Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Riss & Co., Inc. v. United States et al., 1951 — 341 U.S. 907 · caselaw · US
General
Riss & Co., Inc. v. United States et al.
341 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 16, 1951.
No. 479.
Riss & Co., Inc. v. United States et al.
Argued April 11-12,1951.
Decided April 16, 1951.
Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U. S. 33. A. Alvis Layne, Jr. argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were John B. Gage and Wendell Berge. Daniel W. Knowlton argued the cause and filed a brief for the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellee.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Per Curiam: The judgment is reversed.