Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WYNNE, Supervisor of Permits, v. PANCHERI, 1931 — 54 F.2d 73 · caselaw · US
General
WYNNE, Supervisor of Permits, v. PANCHERI
54 F.2d 73·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WYNNE, Supervisor of Permits, v. PANCHERI.
No. 4707.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Dec. 19, 1931.
Andrew B. Dunsmore, U. S,. Atty., of Wellsboro, Pa., and Edward C. Dougherty and Richard Hay Woolsey, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
John Crolly and P. J. Friel, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before WOOLLEY and DAYIS, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On a bill to review the action of the Supervisor of Permits in refusing a permit to the appellee for the operation of a cereal beverage plant for 1930, the District Court, by decree in June, 1931, ordered that a permit issue for that year. The Supervisor appealed. Since then the plant has been destroyed by fire. As, concededly, there is no possibility of its being rebuilt before the expiration of the permit, the questions in the case have become moot. This court, therefore, will make an order affirming the decree of the District Court which, being purely formal, will be without prejudice to either party in any future transactions between them, and' will not commit this court on any of the questions involved.