General
May M. Gugel and Daisy E. Atchinson, Respondents, v. Everett S. Hiscox and Jesse F. Hiscox, Appellants, Impleaded with Daisy E. Hiscox Atchinson, as Executrix, etc., Respondent
177 A.D. 932·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1917·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May M. Gugel and Daisy E. Atchinson, Respondents, v. Everett S. Hiscox and Jesse F. Hiscox, Appellants, Impleaded with Daisy E. Hiscox Atchinson, as Executrix, etc., Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., not voting.