General
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee NOBLES, Defendant-Appellant
522 F.2d 1274·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1975
Before ELY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee NOBLES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 73-2280.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 24, 1975.
Nicholas R. Allis, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal. (argued), for defendant-appellant.
Darrell McIntyre, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffappellee.
The Honorable William B. Enright, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
OPINION
Before ELY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, dated June 23, 1975, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 95 S.Ct. 2160, 45 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975), rev’g United States v. Brown, 501 F.2d 146, 150-157 (9th Cir. 1974). The panel has reconsidered all issues raised by the appellant, and finds no grounds for reversal.