Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Emich Motors Corp. et al. v. General Motors Corp. et al.
340 U.S. 808·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 209.
Emich Motors Corp. et al. v. General Motors Corp. et al.
Thomas Dodd Healy, Harold Stickler and A. Bradley Eben for petitioners. Henry M. Hogan for respondents. Solicitor General Perlman filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted, limited to the question whether the Court of Appeals erred in construing § 5 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, 15 U. S. C. § 16, as not permitting: (a) the admission in the instant case of the indictment in the antecedent criminal case against respondents, nor (6) the judgment therein to be used as evidence that the conspiracy of which respondents had been convicted occasioned Emich Motors’ cancellation.