Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of Thomas Voke et al., Respondents, for Surplus Moneys. John W. Winter, Appellant, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 540 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Petition of Thomas Voke et al., Respondents, for Surplus Moneys. John W. Winter, Appellant
189 N.Y. 540·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Thomas Voke et al., Respondents, for Surplus Moneys. John W. Winter, Appellant.
Matter of Voice, 118 App. Div. 917, appeal dismissed.'
(Argued September 30, 1907;
decided October 8, 1907.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 19, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing distribution of certain surplus moneys arising upon the foreclosure of a mortgage.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appellant had failed to perfect the appeal by filing the required undertaking.
George Barrow for motion.
Martin F. DilLon opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs, and ten dollars costs of motion.