Contracts · MBE-tested
GREEN et al. v. WESTERN UNION TEL. CO.
118 F. 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GREEN et al. v. WESTERN UNION TEL. CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 25, 1902.)
No. 1,148.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas.
William Aubrey, for plaintiffs in error.
Geo. H. Fearons and J. E. Webb, for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit' Judges, and BOARMAN, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
It is very doubtful whether the record in this case presents any question for our review. See Morris v. Jackson, 9 Wall. 125, 19 L. Ed. 608; Martinton v. Fairbanks, 112 U. S. 670, 5 Sup. Ct. 321, 28 L. Ed. 862; Lehnen v. Dickson, 148 U. S. 71, 13 Sup. Ct. 481, 37 L. Ed. 373; St. Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 148 U. S. 92, 13 Sup. Ct. 485, 37 L. Ed. 380. The plaintiff in error urges that the evidence does not support the finding that there was a contract between the parties, which precludes the right to recover on a quantum meruit. The evidence in the case is all found in the bill of exceptions, and we have examined the same. We are satisfied that the finding of the trial judge is amply supported by the evidence. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.