Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WALLACE & TIERNAN CO., Inc., Plaintiff Appellee, v. VILLAGE OF LE ROY, Defendant Appellant, 1927 — 20 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
General
WALLACE & TIERNAN CO., Inc., Plaintiff Appellee, v. VILLAGE OF LE ROY, Defendant Appellant
20 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WALLACE & TIERNAN CO., Inc., Plaintiff Appellee, v. VILLAGE OF LE ROY, Defendant Appellant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 5, 1927.
No. 388.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.
Mayer, Warfield & Watson, of New York City (F. P. Warfield, Lawrence Bristol and C. A. L. Massie, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Cooper, Kerr & Dunham and Wood, Molloy & France, all of New York City (Loren N. Wood, of New York City, and J. Wm. Ellis, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree (17 F.[2d] 593) affirmed with costs.