Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Briggs, doing business as Walt's Auto Parks & Garages, v. City of Los Angeles et al.; Ladrey v. Commission on Licensure to Practice the Healing Art in the District of Columbia, 1959 — 358 U.S. 948 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Briggs, doing business as Walt's Auto Parks & Garages, v. City of Los Angeles et al.; Ladrey v. Commission on Licensure to Practice the Healing Art in the District of Columbia
358 U.S. 948·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 453.
No. 483.
Briggs, doing business as Walt's Auto Parks & Garages, v. City of Los Angeles et al., Ladrey v. Commission on Licensure to Practice the Healing Art in the District of Columbia,
[MAJORITY]
ante, p. 205; and
ante, p. 920. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.