Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Simmons et al. v. Sea-Land Services, Inc., et al., 1982 â 459 U.S. 931 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Simmons et al. v. Sea-Land Services, Inc., et al.
459 U.S. 931·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
with whom Justice OâConnor joins,
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 82-56.
Simmons et al. v. Sea-Land Services, Inc., et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[DISSENT â Justice White,]
Justice White,
with whom Justice OâConnor joins,
dissenting.
Under § 33(b) of the Longshoremenâs and Harbor Workersâ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1440, as amended, 33 U. S. C. § 933(b), the 6-month period within which an injured longshoreman must commence a third-party negligence action against a shipowner begins upon his âAcceptance of . . . compensation under an award in a compensation order.â In this case, the Fourth Circuit held that, in effect, this period begins whenever an injured longshoreman accepts a compensation payment from his employer, even if he does not know at that time what his ultimate recovery will be. This approach conflicts with that of the Second Circuit, which has held that the 6-month period begins only when the total amount of compensation benefits to be received by the injured worker is fixed, either by order, stipulation of the parties, or informal award. See Verderame v. Torm Lines, a/s, 670 F. 2d 5, 7 (CA2 1982). See also DâAmico v. Cia de Nav. Mar. Netumar, 677 F. 2d 249 (CA2 1982). I would grant certiorari in order to resolve the conflict.