Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Benjamin G. Weaver et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant and Respondent, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 633 · caselaw · US
General
Benjamin G. Weaver et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant and Respondent
110 N.Y. 633·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Benjamin G. Weaver et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant and Respondent.
(Argued June 5, 1888;
decided June 19, 1888.)
Ceoss-appeals from order ox the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made October 21,1887, which modified and affirmed, as modified, an order of Special Term settling the bill of costs in this action.
Theodore Bacon for plaintiff.
Charles B. Ernst for defendant.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.