General
Charles L. Kuhn, Respondent, v. John Slote et al., Appellants
170 N.Y. 575·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles L. Kuhn, Respondent, v. John Slote et al., Appellants.
Kuhn v. State, 54 App. Div. 62S, affirmed.
(Argued January 21, 1902;
decided February 25, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 5, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Adolph Pebadow for appellants.
John Laughlin for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Haight, J.