RALPH H. CAMERON, Appellant, v. EDWARD J. BONSALL, Appellee

[Civil No. 1719. Filed November 28, 1919.] [185 Pac. 358.] RALPH H. CAMERON, Appellant, v. EDWARD J. BONSALL, Appellee. Appeal and Error — Review of Finding on Conflicting Evidence.— Where appeal is taken from a refusal to set aside an order in supplemental proceedings requiring appellant to personally appear and answer concerning his property, and evidence as to whether or not he was a resident of the county, within Civil Code of 1913, paragraph 1385, is conflicting, the judgment of the trial court will not be disturbed. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. F. H. Lyman, Judge. Affirmed. Mr. J. E. Morrison, for Appellant. Mr. W. H. Stillwell, for Appellee. [MAJORITY — BAKER, J.] BAKER, J. This appeal was taken from the order of the superior court of Maricopa county, denying appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside an order in supplemental proceedings issued by the said superior court in the case, requiring the appellant to personally appear before the court and answer under oath concerning his property and his ability to pay and satisfy a judgment which had been theretofore rendered against him in the case by the said court. The motion to vacate and set aside the order was made upon the ground that the appellant was not a resident of Maricopa county, but resided in Coconino county. Revised Statutes of Arizona 1913, par. 1385. The matter was heard by the court on affidavits which sharply conflicted on the question of appellant’s residence, and the court having determined the matter adversely to the appellant, upon conflicting evidence, we will not disturb the order. Judgment of the lower court is affirmed. CUNNINGHAM, C. J., and ROSS, J., concur. •