Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary A. Fox, Respondent, v. International Hotel Company, Appellant, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 658 · caselaw · US
General
Mary A. Fox, Respondent, v. International Hotel Company, Appellant
168 N.Y. 658·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary A. Fox, Respondent, v. International Hotel Company, Appellant.
Foxv. International Hotel Go., 41 App. Div. 140, affirmed.
(Argued October 16, 1901;
decided November 1, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court .in the fourth judicial' department, entered June 10, 1899, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury and granting a new trial.
Eugene Carry for appellant.
Spencer Clmton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Parker, Ch. J.