Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Charles Terwilliger et al., Respondents, v. MAX Co., Ltd., et al., Appellants. (Appeal No. 2.)
137 A.D.3d 170327 N.Y.S.3d 411·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2016·NY
Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Curran and Scudder, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Terwilliger et al., Respondents, v MAX Co., Ltd., et al., Appellants. (Appeal No. 2.)
[27 NYS3d 411]
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered January 20, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the motions of plaintiffs for leave to reargue and, upon reargument, denied that part of the motion of defendants seeking summary judgment dismissing the claim of breach of implied warranty of merchantability/ fitness for ordinary purposes.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Terwilliger v Max Co., Ltd. ([appeal No. 1] 137 AD3d 1699 [2016]).
Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Curran and Scudder, JJ.