Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DuPont et al., Trustees, v. Crummer Company et al., 1958 — 358 U.S. 884 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
DuPont et al., Trustees, v. Crummer Company et al.
358 U.S. 884·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 366.
DuPont et al., Trustees, v. Crummer Company et al.
John Lord O’Brian and Hugh B. Cox for petitioners. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Ralph M. McLane, Assistant Attorney General, for Shafer et al., Donald Russell and Clarence G. Ashby for Ball et al., Charles R. Scott for the St. Joe Paper Co., and H. M. Voorhis and W. H. Poe for Leedy, Wheeler & Alleman, Inc., et ah, petitioners. Francis P. Whitehair, Chris Dixie and Warren E. Hall, Jr. for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.