General
William Curtis, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburgh Railroad Company, Respondent
131 N.Y. 601·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Curtis, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburgh Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Submitted January 29, 1892;
decided March 1, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made September 8, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at. Circuit.
D. P. Morehouse for appellant.
Edmund B. Wynn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.