Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Reeves v. Alabama, 1954 — 348 U.S. 891 · caselaw · US
General
Reeves v. Alabama
348 U.S. 89199 L. Ed. 2d 700·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 6, 1954.
No. 120.
Reeves v. Alabama.
Argued November 15-16, 1954.
Decided December 6, 1954.
Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner.
With him on the brief were Thurgood Marshall, Robert L. Carter and Louis H. Poliak.
Robert Straub, Assistant Attorney-General of Alabama, and Robert B. Stewart argued the cause for respondent.
With them on the brief was Si Garrett, Attorney General.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 347 U. S. 1012, to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
Per Curiam:
Judgment reversed. See Canty v. Alabama, 309 U. S. 629, and Vernon v. Alabama, 313 U. S. 547.