Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George A. Treadwell, Respondent, v. William A. Clark, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1908 — 192 N.Y. 530 · caselaw · US
General
George A. Treadwell, Respondent, v. William A. Clark, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
192 N.Y. 530·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George A. Treadwell, Respondent, v. William A. Clark, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Treadwell v. Clark, 184 App. Div. 856. appeal dismissed.
(Argued March 31, 1908;
decided April 7, 1908.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 7, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate a judgment.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction of the appeal inasmuch as it is not from a final order in a special proceeding but from one which was purely discretionary, and that permission to appeal had not been obtained.
Charles B. Demond for motion.
Alfred M. Cruikshank opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.