General
Thomas H. Thorn et al., Respondents, v. James Sutherland, et al., Appellants
131 N.Y. 622·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas H. Thorn et al., Respondents, v. James Sutherland, et al., Appellants.
(Argued February 8, 1892;
decided March 1, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made November 16,1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
S. B. Brownell for appellants.
Robert A. B. Dayton for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of Ingraham, J., below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.