General
Minnie Noble, as Administratrix of Thomas Noble, Deceased, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
161 N.Y. 620·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Minnie Noble, as Administratrix of Thomas Noble, Deceased, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Noble v. N. T. O. & 3. R, R. R. Oo., 20 App. Div. 40, affirmed.
(Argued October 5, 1899;
decided November 28, 1899.)
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 15, 189T, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the verdict of a jury, and also affirming an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Frank Loomis, Charles C. Paulding and Samuel F. Williamson for appellant.
Arthur J. Burns for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Oh. J., and O’Brien, J., dissenting, and Gray, J., not sitting..