Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. Esler Eckerson et al., Appellants, v. The Village of Haverstraw et al., Respondents, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 652 · caselaw · US
General
J. Esler Eckerson et al., Appellants, v. The Village of Haverstraw et al., Respondents
162 N.Y. 652·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Cullen, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. Esler Eckerson et al., Appellants, v. The Village of Haverstraw et al., Respondents.
Eckerson v. Village of Haverstraw, 6 App. Div. 102, affirmed.
(Argued April 3, 1900;
decided April 24, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 8, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
Louis Marshall for appellants.
William McCauley, Jr., and Alonzo Wheeler for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Cullen, J.