Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas VENTOLA et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, 1925 — 5 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas VENTOLA et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES
5 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas VENTOLA et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 16, 1925.)
No. 6991.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.'
Joseph McCoy, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
H. L. Donnelly, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Kansas City, Mo.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error docketed and
dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, on motion of defendant in error, under rule 16.