General

Julius Gordon, Appellant, v. Alfred Visone, Alfredo Realty Co., Inc., Fortune Realty Corp. and Maurice Albert, Respondents

247 A.D. 757·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1936·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Julius Gordon, Appellant, v. Alfred Visone, Alfredo Realty Co., Inc., Fortune Realty Corp. and Maurice Albert, Respondents. [MAJORITY] Action to restrain defendants from conducting a business similar to that conducted by plaintiff, a lessee of one of the defendants. The complaint was dismissed, without testimony being taken, on the ground that it did not state a cause of action. Order dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant to abide the event, on the authority of Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co. (265 N. Y. 1); Tuttle v. Buck (107 Minn. 145; 119 N. W. 946); Dunshee v. Standard Oil Co. (152 Iowa, 618, 624; 132 N. W. 371; 36 L. R. A. [N. S.] 263); Amer. Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Bank (256 U. S: 350). Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.